In the processing step, we excluded 5011 (3.8%) records which had an empty value in the column recording the review type due to technical issues in the submissions system for Nature Communications. Journal Issue available online . . Any conclusive statement about the efficacy of DBPR would have to wait until such control can be implemented or more data collected. Editorial process | Nature Communications Cochrane Database Syst Rev. The prestige of the corresponding authors institutions was measured from the data of the Global Research Identifier Database (GRID) by dividing institutions in three prestige groups with reference to the 2016 Times Higher Education (THE) ranking. If an author wishes to appeal against Nature 's decision, the appeal must be made in writing, not by telephone, and should be confined to the scientific case for publication. Finally, editors need to assess these reviews and formulate a decision. Editors need to identify, invite and get (often two or more) reviewers to agree to review. The proportion of authors that choose double-blind review is higher when they submit to more prestigious journals, they are affiliated with less prestigious institutions, or they are from specific countries; the double-blind option is also linked to less successful editorial outcomes. Blank RM. This is a statistically significant result, with a small effect size; the results of Pearsons chi-square test of independence are as follows: 2=1533.9, df=2, p value <0.001, Cramers V=0.147. The final dataset was further processed and then analysed statistically using the statistical programming language R, version 3.4.0. First, we calculated the acceptance rate by gender, regardless of review type (Table12). We fitted logistic regression models and report details on their goodness of fit. The target number of required reviews has been completed, and the Handling Editor is considering the reviews. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of Springer Nature. EDR was the major contributor in writing the Discussion and Conclusions sections. (Courtesy of Clarivate Analytics), The Eigenfactor Score calculation is based on the number of times articles from the journal published in the past five years have been cited in the JCR year, but it also considers which journals have contributed these citations so that highly cited journals will influence the network more than lesser cited journals. Thus, our unit of analysis is identified by three elements: the manuscript, the corresponding author, and the journal. The status of the manuscript says 'Reviewers Assigned' for about 24 days. Moreover, some records were not complete if authors made spelling mistakes when entering the names of their country or institution, as this would have made it impossible to match those names with normalised names for countries or for institutions using GRID. Thank you for visiting nature.com. The decision involved a ruling on a motion to . Any correspondence, queries or additional requests for information on the Manuscript Submission process should be sent to the Natural Product Communications editorial office as follows: [email protected], 614-786-1970. 7u?p#T3;JUQJBw|u 2v{}ru76SRA? Among the studies dealing with institutional bias, an analysis of abstracts submitted to the American Heart Associations annual Scientific Sessions research meeting from 2000 to 2004 found some evidence of bias favouring authors from English-speaking countries and prestigious institutions [14]. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts In these scenarios, crowd wisdom peaks early then becomes less accurate as more individuals become involved, explained senior author Iain Couzin, a professor of ecology and evolutionary biology.

Glasgow Jewellery Arcade, Faribault County Warrant List, Most Common Ethical Violations In Counseling In Florida, Articles D